Russell Ex Rel. C.G. v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the ALJ “(1) did not err by failing to examine limitations from mental impairments along any of the domains of functioning, (2) did not err in evaluating the general health and well being domain, but (3) did err in his examination of the moving about domain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).