Russell E. Dingle, Thomas L. Rempfer, United States of America, Ex Rel. v. Bioport Corporation, Robert Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two public disclosures revealing the critical elements of the relators’ claim, taken together, were sufficient to “put the government on notice of the possibility of fraud”
• holding that if information about both a false state of facts and the true state of facts is available to the government, an inference of fraud is reasonable and the justification for the citizen suit provision of the False Claims Act is no longer applicable
• holding that if information about both a false state of facts and the true state of facts is available to the government, an inference of fraud is reasonable and the justification for the citizen suit provision of the False Claims Act is no longer applicable
• finding public disclosure where part of the relevant information came from a journal article and part came from a House of Representatives report
• finding public disclosure where part of the relevant information came from a journal article and part came from a House of Representatives report
• explaining journal article must be viewed alongside other materials to constitute public disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).