Russell, David v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government's right to search all persons and their belongings who cross its borders is plenary and is \reasonable\ per se within the Fourth Amendment
• holding that government’s right to search all persons and their belongings who cross its borders is plenary and is “reasonable” per se within the Fourth Amendment
• holding that government's right to search all persons and their belongings who cross its borders is plenary and is \reasonable\ per se within the Fourth Amendment
• holding that searches for contraband in international mail did not violate the Fourth Amendment, repeatedly stressing that statutes forbade reading correspondence in the envelopes
• holding that government's right to search all persons and their belongings who cross its borders is plenary and is \reasonable\ per se within the Fourth Amendment
• noting that the government’s power to exclude contraband “can be effectuated by routine inspections and searches of individuals or conveyances seeking to cross our borders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).