Russell Corp. v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an E/C which neither denies a petition for benefits nor elects to pay and investigate pursuant to section 440.20(4) is placed in the identical position as the E/C that files a notice of denial
• holding claimed benefits not denied within fourteen days áre deemed denied
• failure to file a notice of denial in response to a petition for benefits operates as a denial of every allegation therein under section 440.192(8)
• “In practical effect, ... failure to respond to the petition for benefits ... operated not as an admission of compensability but as a denial of every allegation [and demand for benefits] in the petition for benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).