Russell Bucklew v. Al Luebbers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the admission of photos showing the “severely decomposed” bodies of the victims did not violate the petitioner’s right to due process because the photos arguably were relevant and probative
• stating that “no prejudice resulted” in a capital case from defense counsel’s failure to pursue a line of argument that would have had a “mixed impact”
• utilizing state court’s recitation of facts on review of federal habeas petition
• utilizing state court’s recitation of facts on review of federal habeas petition
• utilizing state court’s recitation of facts on review of federal habeas petition
• utilizing state court’s recitation of facts on review of federal habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).