Skip to main content
· 7/1/1965

Russell & Axon v. Handshoe

Citations

  • 176 So. 2d 909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “if no definite period is otherwise stated or proved for its continuance, [employment] is presumed to be a hiring at will”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wigginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.