· 7/1/1965
Russell & Axon v. Handshoe
Citations
- 176 So. 2d 909
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “if no definite period is otherwise stated or proved for its continuance, [employment] is presumed to be a hiring at will”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wigginton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.