· 8/20/2002
Russann H. Hall v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Citations
- 300 F.3d 1197
- 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2441
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17174
- 2002 WL 1902881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the administrative record must include “the materials compiled by the administrator in the course of making his decision” to deny benefits
- explaining that the party seeking to supplement the record bears the burden of showing how the evidence is necessary to the district court’s review
- providing a non-exhaustive list of various circumstances in ERISA cases that “could warrant the admission of additional evidence”
- “Supplementation . . . help[s] protect employees’ substantive rights in those limited circumstances where extra-record evidence is relevant and necessary.”
- “federal courts are limited to the ‘administrative record’—the materials compiled by the administrator in the course of making [its] decision”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Holloway, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.