Skip to main content
· 8/20/2002

Russann H. Hall v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

Citations

  • 300 F.3d 1197
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2441
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17174
  • 2002 WL 1902881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the administrative record must include “the materials compiled by the administrator in the course of making his decision” to deny benefits
  • explaining that the party seeking to supplement the record bears the burden of showing how the evidence is necessary to the district court’s review
  • providing a non-exhaustive list of various circumstances in ERISA cases that “could warrant the admission of additional evidence”
  • “Supplementation . . . help[s] protect employees’ substantive rights in those limited circumstances where extra-record evidence is relevant and necessary.”
  • “federal courts are limited to the ‘administrative record’—the materials compiled by the administrator in the course of making [its] decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Holloway, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.