Rusi Holding Corp. v. Inner City El.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that offeree did not meet burden of proving that $500 proposal for settlement was made in bad faith where claimed damages were $300,000
• holding seller was entitled to attorney’s fees based on a provision in the contract as well as under 768.79
• finding that a $500 proposal was made in good faith
• reversing the trial court’s finding of a lack of good faith, despite the fact the offeror had conducted little discovery, because the unenforceability of the contract was apparent from its face
• “Under section 57.041(1), a judge has no discretion to deny recovery of costs to the prevailing party.”
• “Under section 57.041(1), a judge has no discretion to deny recovery of costs to the prevailing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).