Skip to main content
· 6/29/1999

Rushton v. E & S International Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Eleva, Inc.)

Citations

  • 235 B.R. 486
  • 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 512
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 746
  • 1999 WL 435120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The relevant date to determine when new value is given is the date of the shipment of the goods.”
  • “Once a trustee has established that a transfer is a preference, a creditor may assert a defense as provided in 11 U.S.C. § 547(c).”
  • “Once a trustee has established that a transfer is a preference, a creditor may assert a defense as provided in 11 U.S.C. § 547(c).”
  • find ing lessor’s forbearance from exercising his right to evict debtor did not constitute new value
  • defense was unavailing when new advances were made before the preferential transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bohanon, Robinson, Cornish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.