Skip to main content
· 4/20/1984

Rushlow v. Department of Employment & Training

Citations

  • 476 A.2d 139
  • 144 Vt. 328
  • 1984 Vt. LEXIS 452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an employee must make an effort to remedy poor working conditions unless the effort “would be unavailing”
  • explaining that an employee must make an effort to remedy poor working conditions unless the effort \would be unavailing\
  • stating that quitting for anticipatory reasons is not good cause attributable to employer, and concluding that employee failed to demonstrate that meeting with employer would have been fruitless
  • stating that quitting for anticipatory reasons is not good cause attributable to employer, and concluding that employee failed to demonstrate that meeting with employer would have been fruitless
  • explaining that anticipatory reason for quitting “is not good cause attributable to the employer”
  • upholding Board's finding that employee quit because he thought employer was going to limit his hours rather than because he refused to drive unsafe truck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.