Skip to main content
· 2/10/1972

Rushing v. Williams

Citations

  • 188 S.E.2d 437
  • 125 Ga. App. 601
  • 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contemplating that plaintiff who had lost securities could satisfy tender requirement by obtaining a re-issue of them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evans, Bell, Eberhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.