Skip to main content
· 10/6/2010

Rushing v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC (In Re Rushing)

Citations

  • 443 B.R. 85
  • 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the debtor’s non-filing spouse did not have standing to pursue a claim under 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)
  • recognizing statutory nature of stay, but concluding that court still has interest in ensuring compliance
  • “A bankruptcy court has a unique and compelling interest in insuring obedience to the restrictions imposed by the automatic stay.”
  • complaint under § 362(k) not subject to mandatory arbitration because the rights asserted are conferred by the Bankruptcy Code, not the debtor's pre-petition legal or equitable rights
  • non-debtor’s alleged loss not shown to have resulted from stay violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bill Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.