· 6/7/2012
Rushing v. Com.
Citations
- 726 S.E.2d 333
- 284 Va. 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an argument regarding the admissibility of evidence may properly be made as the reason why the evidence is insufficient
- holding that an argument regarding the admissibility of evidence may properly be made as the reason why the evidence is insufficient
- holding that an argument regarding the admissibility of evidence may properly be made as the reason why the evidence is insufficient
- considering only properly admitted evidence in sufficiency review as a result of Virginia statute, appellate procedure, and rules of evidence
- considering only properly admitted evidence in sufficiency review as a result of Virginia statute, appellate procedure, and rules of evidence
- considering only properly admitted evidence in sufficiency review as a result of Virginia statute, appellate procedure, and rules of evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christian Lee Rushing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.