Rusha v. W. G. Coyle Co.

Citations

• 149 La. 731
• 90 So. 144
• 1921 La. LEXIS 1499

Syllabus

<p>(Syllabus by Editorial StaffJ</p> <p>Master and servant <&wkey;>30l(l) — Automobile owner not iiabie for driver’s negligence with- '■ out proof of employment.</p> <p>■ 'An owner of an automobile is not liable for damages resulting from the negligence of some one else in the operation of the car, without proof or reasonable presumption that the person who operated the ear was employed or autho'rized; by the owner to operate the car.</p>