Rush v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A husband’s colorable disposition of assets to defeat his wife’s property rights in pending or anticipated divorce suit may be found to be fraudulent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alston v. Bitely
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-03-13· cited 26×
• Brown v. Butler
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-29· cited 17×
• Ginsburg v. Ginsburg
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-26· cited 17×
• Stewart v. Combs
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-11-16· cited 11×
• George v. George
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1979-12-05· cited 5×
• National Investors Life Insurance v. Tudor
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-10-09· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rush v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1964-05-18· cited 25×
• Austin v. Austin
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1920-04-05· cited 13×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1924-03-24· cited 9×
• Wasson v. Lightle
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1933-12-18· cited 8×
• Sims v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1934-03-05· cited 6×
• Dunn v. Dunn
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1927-06-27· cited 6×
• Godwin v. Godwin
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1960-03-28· cited 3×
• Smith v. Arkadelphia Milling Co.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1920-04-05· cited 1×