Rush v. Safeway Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Section 61.30(17) “former husband was not entitled to retroactive child support for the time the parties continued to reside together”
• reversing the award of retroactive child support and remanding with directions to recalculate the child support from the date the parties no longer resided together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).