Skip to main content

Rush v. Ray

Citations

  • 362 N.W.2d 479
  • 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering item vetoes of provisions of 1979 Iowa Acts chapters 4, 5, and 14 and 1980 Iowa Acts chapters 1001 and 1007
  • \[The governor's power is a negative one that does not allow him to legislate by striking qualifications in a manner which distorts legislative intent.\
  • \[T]he governor's power is a negative one that does not allow him to legislate by striking qualifications in a manner which distorts legislative intent.\
  • “The vetoed language created conditions, restricting the use of the money to the stated purpose. It is not severable, because upon excision of this language, the rest of the legislation is affected.”
  • “The vetoed language created conditions, restricting the use of the money to the stated purpose. It is not severable, because upon excision of this language, the rest of the legislation is affected.”
  • power to appropriate funds and restrict their use is legislative function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schultz, Reynold-Son, Harris, McGiverin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.