Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/13/1985
Rush v. Ray
Citations
- 362 N.W.2d 479
- 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering item vetoes of provisions of 1979 Iowa Acts chapters 4, 5, and 14 and 1980 Iowa Acts chapters 1001 and 1007
- \[The governor's power is a negative one that does not allow him to legislate by striking qualifications in a manner which distorts legislative intent.\
- \[T]he governor's power is a negative one that does not allow him to legislate by striking qualifications in a manner which distorts legislative intent.\
- “The vetoed language created conditions, restricting the use of the money to the stated purpose. It is not severable, because upon excision of this language, the rest of the legislation is affected.”
- “The vetoed language created conditions, restricting the use of the money to the stated purpose. It is not severable, because upon excision of this language, the rest of the legislation is affected.”
- power to appropriate funds and restrict their use is legislative function
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schultz, Reynold-Son, Harris, McGiverin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rants v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-06-16· cited 41×
- In the Interest of C.S.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1994-05-25· cited 32×
- Colton v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-07-31· cited 26×
- Alaska Legislative Council v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-04-20· cited 26×
- Wielechowski v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-08-25· cited 18×
- N.D. Legislative Assembly v. BurgumNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-07-30· cited 17×
- Danny Homan, William A. Dotzler, Jr., Bruce Hunter, David Jacoby, Kirsten Running-Marquardt, and Daryl Beall v. Terry E. Branstad, Governor of the State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2012-03-16· cited 15×
- In the Interest of D.C.V.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1997-09-17· cited 13×
- Welsh v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-05-15· cited 12×
- Drummond v. BeasleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-02· cited 10×
- Wengert v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-09-18· cited 10×
- Johnson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-10-15· cited 8×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-07-19· cited 138×
- Brown v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-13· cited 97×
- Fulmore v. LaneTexas Supreme Court· 1911-11-22· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. DodsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1940-10-14· cited 68×
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-04-09· cited 49×
- Henry v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-03-24· cited 44×
- State Ex Rel. Link v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 43×
- Green v. City of CascadeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-07-31· cited 38×
- Welden v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-05-12· cited 37×
- Rush v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-04-20· cited 37×
- State ex rel. Brown v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court· 1972-12-15· cited 24×
- Fain v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court· 1980-11-13· cited 17×
- Brault v. HollemanSupreme Court of Virginia· 1976-11-24· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.