Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/15/1980

Rush v. Parham

Citations

  • 625 F.2d 1150
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a state Medicaid agency can review the medical necessity of treatment prescribed by a doctor on a case-by-case basis”
  • “We disagree with the district court, and hold instead that a state may adopt a definition of medical necessity that places reasonable limits on a physician’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.