· 11/6/1976
Rush v. King Oil Co.
Citations
- 556 P.2d 431
- 220 Kan. 616
- 57 Oil & Gas Rep. 192
- 1976 Kan. LEXIS 515
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when apparent from the record the district court was aware of proper legal test to be applied, appellate court presumes it applied proper test
- when apparent from the record the district court was aware of proper legal test to be applied, appellate court presumes it applied proper test
- when apparent from the record the district court was aware of proper legal test to be applied, appellate court presumes it applied proper test
- reiterating the implied covenant to prudently develop
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fromme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.