Skip to main content
· 11/6/1976

Rush v. King Oil Co.

Citations

  • 556 P.2d 431
  • 220 Kan. 616
  • 57 Oil & Gas Rep. 192
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when apparent from the record the district court was aware of proper legal test to be applied, appellate court presumes it applied proper test
  • when apparent from the record the district court was aware of proper legal test to be applied, appellate court presumes it applied proper test
  • when apparent from the record the district court was aware of proper legal test to be applied, appellate court presumes it applied proper test
  • reiterating the implied covenant to prudently develop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.