Skip to main content
· 4/5/2011

Rush v. Kimco Corp.

Citations

  • 338 S.W.3d 407
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 453
  • 2011 WL 1233694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring employer to show violation of a work rule of significant import to constitute misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mitchell, Ellis, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.