· 3/2/2006
Rush v. Barnhart
Citations
- 432 F. Supp. 2d 969
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65967
- 2006 WL 1312959
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting an ALJ’s speculation that a plaintiff “would be able to work on a sustained basis at the level he determined if she lost weight” in the future
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hovland, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.