Skip to main content
· 3/2/2006

Rush v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 432 F. Supp. 2d 969
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65967
  • 2006 WL 1312959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting an ALJ’s speculation that a plaintiff “would be able to work on a sustained basis at the level he determined if she lost weight” in the future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hovland, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.