Skip to main content
· 8/12/2004

Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe

Citations

  • 107 P.3d 402
  • 2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 1427
  • 2004 WL 3153206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a trial court’s ruling may be affirmed based on any grounds that are supported by the record
  • holding that an appellate court may affirm the trial court’s ruling on any grounds supported by the record
  • recognizing that we may affirm the trial court’s ruling based on any grounds that are supported by the record
  • holding that a district court’s judgment may be affirmed on different grounds that are supported by the record
  • holding that a tribe’s agent who has apparent authority may waive immunity without board approval
  • “[W]e may affirm the trial court’s ruling based on any grounds that are supported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Davidson, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.