Skip to main content
· 7/17/1907

Rush Banks v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.

Citations

  • 46 Wash. 610
  • 90 P. 1048
  • 1907 Wash. LEXIS 672

Syllabus

<p>Torts — Malice—Wrongful Motive in Lawful Act — Master and Servant — Selection of Hospital. A physician who conducts a public hospital has no cause of action against a lumber and railway company for maliciously paying hospital dues, deducted from the wages of its employees, to a rival hospital, and requiring such employees to receive attendance from such rival hospital, after the employees had requested the payment of such dues to the plaintiff, whose hospital they wished to patronize; since the employer may select its own hospital, is under no contract obligation with the plaintiff, and is not liable for malice in lawfully employing men under agreement to attend a hospital of its own selection.</p>

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.