Skip to main content
· 8/9/1994

Rural Area Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board

Citations

  • 646 A.2d 717
  • 166 Pa. Commw. 520
  • 1994 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • objectors’ arguments that proposed quarry would have detrimental effect on community did not constitute substantial evidence that quarry use would affect health and safety of community
  • objectors’ arguments that proposed quarry would have detrimental effect on community did not constitute substantial evidence that quarry use would affect health and safety of community
  • objectors’ arguments that proposed quarry would have detrimental effect on community did not constitute substantial evidence that quarry use would affect health and safety of community
  • objectors' evidence of harm must meet a high degree of probability standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Colins, McGinley, Friedman, Kelley, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.