Ruppe v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering that the discovery request was not narrowly tailored in denying plaintiffs’ motion for expedited discovery
• denying request for expedited discovery in part because “plaintiff has not made an adequate showing that it will be irreparably harmed by delaying the broad-based discovery requested until after the initial conference between the parties pursuant to Rule 26.... ”
• “Here, as no [preliminary injunction] hearing or determination is pending, expedited discovery is premature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).