Rupp v. Schon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n action for conversion of money can only be maintained where the money at issue has been kept separate.”
• even if the plaintiff had a valid claim for conversion, such claim could be asserted against only the corporation which received the plaintiffs property, not the individual who was the corporation’s sole shareholder, because the individual did not personally receive the property
• even if the plaintiff had a valid claim for conversion, such claim could be asserted against only the corporation which received the plaintiff’s property, not the individual who was the corporation’s sole shareholder, because the individual did not personally receive the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).