Rupley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the government’s “novel argument that testimony regarding the intercepted telephone conversations is admissible because the witnesses were testifying from their personal recall of the conversations with the defendant, and not from the illegally obtained tapes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).