Skip to main content
· 8/24/2004

Rupert v. McCurdy

Citations

  • 141 S.W.3d 334
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 7582
  • 2004 WL 1879640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plaintiffs’ response to the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration raising the “defense” that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable was sufficient to preserve their argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moseley, Richter, Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.