Skip to main content
· 3/30/2010

Rupert v. City of Rochester, Department of Environmental Services

Citations

  • 701 F. Supp. 2d 430
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30678
  • 2010 WL 1267122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that discrimination “claims under the NYSHRL are analyzed under the same legal framework as ADEA claims”
  • holding ten-day unpaid suspension an adverse employment action
  • “A triable issue of fact as to constructive discharge may be demonstrated by proof that an employee was presented with the decision to resign or be fired.”
  • “Speculation and conclusory allegations do not demonstrate pretext.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marian W. Payson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.