Rupe v. Cate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds but stating that defendants “may renew [their qualified immunity 24 argument] on any motion for summary judgment.”
• “Accordingly, the Court finds that RLUIPA requires state recipients of federal funds to waive immunity only as to suits for injunctive relief.”
• denying to dismiss complaint on 9 qualified immunity grounds because it could not be clearly determined on the face of complaint, 10 but declaring that the ground could be raised through summary judgment
• denial of qualified immunity because it could not be clearly determined on the face 19 of the complaint, but the court stated the ground could be raised by way of a motion for summary 20 judgment
• “Prisoners who have been released from prison or transferred to a different 26 1 The Court exercises its discretion to screen the proposed third amended complaint. See Hebrard v. Nofziger, 90 F.4th 1000, 1006 (9th Cir. 2024

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).