Rupard v. Rupard's Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment on the plaintiff’s ADA discrimination claim where the plaintiff offered no comparator evidence and failed to show that non-disabled employees were treated more favorably
• where defendant relied on pre-ADAAA case law and “given the lenient standards of the ADAAA,” plaintiff raised a genuine issue of fact regarding whether her bipolar disorder was a disability
• where defendant relied on pre-ADAAA case law and “given the lenient standards of the ADAAA,” plaintiff raised a genuine issue of fact regarding whether her bipolar disorder was a disability
• “In the disparate- discipline context, a plaintiff typically satisfies her burden under the third element by showing that a non-disabled employee, or ‘comparator’ engaged in a similar work rule violation but was treated more fairly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).