Runnymede-Piper v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “assuming arguendo that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a predicate violation founded in a parent’s constitutional right to the custody of her child”
• “[T]he District of Columbia Superior Court would naturally have greater familiarity and interest in the issues that remain.”
• “[T]he District of Columbia Superior Court would naturally have greater familiarity and interest in the issues that remain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).