Runner v. National Industrial Builders, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss based on federal preemption because changing the fill volume in each vial of eye drops would require prior FDA approval
• dismissing MMPA claim because plaintiff received exact quantity of eye drops advertised
• rejecting claim that overfilling vials of prescription eye drops violated the MMPA
• “Missouri courts apply the ‘benefit of the bargain’ rule when determining if a plaintiff has suffered an ascertainable loss under the MMPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).