Runner v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that substantial evidence supported a finding that claimant was discharged from her employment for misconduct because she was “aware of her responsibilities, was capable of performing her duties, and had been warned of the consequences of her actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).