Skip to main content
· 6/9/1953

Runner v. Calvert Fire Insurance

Citations

  • 76 S.E.2d 244
  • 138 W. Va. 369
  • 44 A.L.R. 2d 1075
  • 1953 W. Va. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where we applied the doctrines of waiver and estoppel against an insurer to nullify the insurer’s subrogation claim against an insured
  • “Where, under the facts and circumstances of a particular case, the court cannot, as a matter of law, hold that the specific provisions of an insurance contract have been breached, the question is one for jury determination.”
  • “Where, under the facts and circumstances of a particular case, the court cannot, as a matter of law, hold that the specific provisions of an insurance contract have been breached, the question is one for jury determination.”
  • policy provisions may be waived by an insurance agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.