· 6/9/1953
Runner v. Calvert Fire Insurance
Citations
- 76 S.E.2d 244
- 138 W. Va. 369
- 44 A.L.R. 2d 1075
- 1953 W. Va. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where we applied the doctrines of waiver and estoppel against an insurer to nullify the insurer’s subrogation claim against an insured
- “Where, under the facts and circumstances of a particular case, the court cannot, as a matter of law, hold that the specific provisions of an insurance contract have been breached, the question is one for jury determination.”
- “Where, under the facts and circumstances of a particular case, the court cannot, as a matter of law, hold that the specific provisions of an insurance contract have been breached, the question is one for jury determination.”
- policy provisions may be waived by an insurance agent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.