Skip to main content
· 4/20/1948

Rundell v. Box

Citations

  • 89 F. Supp. 166
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it appears to be the general rule of the federal courts that a party has standing to challenge a subpoena when she alleges a ‘personal right or privilege with respect to the materials subpoenaed.’”
  • “determining whether the plaintiff has placed her mental condition at issue so as to waive the privilege is analogous to, and should be generally consistent with, the analysis conducted when a Rule 35(a) examination is requested”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Symes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.