Rundel v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conceiving of injury so remotely connected to crime as to not allow restitution
• holding foreseeability of injury not required
• there must be a causal connection \between the crime and the injuries for which compensation is sought\
• foreseeabilty rejected as part of causal connection requirement of RCW 9.94A.142
• foreseeabilty rejected as part of causal connection requirement of RCW 9.94A.142

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).