Rumscheidt v. Rumscheidt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because trial court did not grant father’s motion to modify child support, trial court was not required to issue findings and conclusions under section 154.130
• trial court may consider child support guidelines to determine whether material and substantial change in circumstances has occurred to warrant modification
• “The trial court did not grant Mark’s motion to 13 modify child support; therefore, the court was not required to make the specific statutory findings required under Family Code section 154.130.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).