Skip to main content
· 1/30/1922

Rumbaugh v. Jordan

Citations

  • 118 Wash. 539
  • 203 P. 968
  • 1922 Wash. LEXIS 672

Syllabus

<p>Mortgages (132, 143) — Foreclosure—Defenses — Extension op Maturity of Debt. In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defense that its maturity had been extended for a period of three years is not established hy evidence showing the mortgagee offered an extension for .that period at an interest rate of seven per cent, and it appears that the mortgagor had notified his agent to get the money at six per cent or at any rate better than the mortgagee’s proposition, and that, on the agent’s taking the matter up with the mortgagee, the latter withdrew his offer of an extension.</p>

Judges: Tolman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.