Rullo v. Rullo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that estate, which alleged that criminal defendant had engaged in trespass and negligence, had no right to intervene in criminal case
• explaining that estate, which alleged that criminal defendant had engaged in trespass and negligence, “had no opportunity or right to intervene in the [defendant’s] criminal case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).