Rule v. Rule

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that by filing a formal appearance, and participating in prior hearings, the defendant clearly intended to submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Colby v. Colby
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-01-11· cited 15×
• Mirabal v. Mirabal
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-06· cited 14×
• Lindo v. Lindo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-05-12· cited 7×
• Rule v. Rule
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Irving M. Levin, Etc. v. David R. Berley
  First Circuit· 1984-02-24· cited 47×
• Beardsley v. Beardsley
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-12-26· cited 43×
• Buckley v. John
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-10-29· cited 38×
• Morabito v. Wachsman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-16· cited 28×
• Harvey v. Fiduciary Trust Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1938-02-18· cited 23×
• Conley v. Conley
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-07-05· cited 17×
• Paden v. Warnke
  New York Supreme Court· 1981-04-15· cited 9×