Skip to main content
· 4/30/1942

Rule v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 127 F.2d 979
  • 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462
  • 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing location of sale or transaction as a “critical difference” between EP and CEP sales
  • “[T]he location of the sale appears to be critical to the distinction between the two categories.”
  • “When the EP definition is read in conjunction with the CEP definition, the alleged ambiguity in the EP definition disappears.”
  • quot- ing NSK Ltd. v. United States, 115 F.3d 965, 975 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
  • quot- ing NSK Ltd. v. United States, 115 F.3d 965, 975 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
  • relying on Sales Verification Report at 6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bratton, Murrah, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.