· 4/30/1942
Rule v. Commissioner
Citations
- 127 F.2d 979
- 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462
- 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing location of sale or transaction as a “critical difference” between EP and CEP sales
- “[T]he location of the sale appears to be critical to the distinction between the two categories.”
- “When the EP definition is read in conjunction with the CEP definition, the alleged ambiguity in the EP definition disappears.”
- quot- ing NSK Ltd. v. United States, 115 F.3d 965, 975 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
- quot- ing NSK Ltd. v. United States, 115 F.3d 965, 975 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
- relying on Sales Verification Report at 6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bratton, Murrah, Phillips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.