Ruiz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of pro se rule 3.170(£) motion; motion was a nullity since it was made while defendant was represented by counsel and “devoid of allegations giving rise to an adversarial relationship with counsel” (citing Sheppard v. State, 17 So.3d 275, 286 (Fla.2009))
• affirming denial of pro se rule 3.170(l) motion; motion was a nullity since it was made while defendant was represented by counsel and “devoid of allegations giving rise to an adversarial relationship with counsel” (citing Sheppard v. State, 17 So. 3d 275, 286 (Fla. 2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Gianni Passino v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-02· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Sheppard v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-08-27· cited 113×