Ruiz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have previously explained that a person loses standing to move for postconviction relief under Rule 61 where the defendant is not in custody or subject to future custody for the underlying offense or challenged sentence.”
• “We have previously explained that a person loses standing to move for postconviction relief under Rule 61 where the defendant is not in custody or subject to future custody for the underlying offense or challenged sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CAMMILE v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2009-10-20· cited 2×
• Crisco v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-01-20
• Baltazar v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-01-20
• State of Delaware v. Lewis.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-01-22
• Matter of Coleman
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-03-09
• Coleman v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-08-27
• State v. Jackson, Sr.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2016-12-05
• Gainer v. State
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2019-10-23
• State v. Martin
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-03-17