Ruiz v. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that § 1692k(c) does not preclude PDCPA liability resulting from a creditor’s mistaken legal interpretation of a Minnesota garnishment statute
• noting that the United States Postal Service considers a complete address as including, when applicable, a unit number
• noting that the United States Postal Service considers a complete address as including, when applicable, a unit number
• noting that under Rule 55(a), “a party should receive the best notice practicable under the circumstances” and that the rule was intended to give a defaulting party a “second chance” to avoid the entry of default judgment
• affirming superior court’s order vacating a default judgment because the entry of default was ineffective, rendering the default judgment void
• affirming superior court’s order vacating entry of default and default judgment because entry of default was ineffective, resulting in a void judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).