Ruiz v. Alegria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although a reference to a tariff classification in a final order is not dispositive, “it is a factor to be considered, along with all factors pertinent to the issue of the intended scope of the order[ ]”
• explaining that scope rulings clarify the terms of the original order but do not modify or amend them
• explaining that scope rulings clarify the terms of the original order but do not modify or amend them
• explaining that “the scope of a final order” may be “clarified,” but not “changed in a way contrary to its terms”
• \The class or kind of merchandise encompassed by a final antidumping order is determined by the order....\
• 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(c)(l) clearly indicates that the decision of the CIT is of controlling effect when rendered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).