Ruiz v. Aerorep Group Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of Ruiz’s FWBA claim where the complaint failed to allege that Ruiz’s co-employee battered her with the purpose of benefitting the interests of the employer
• “Although an employer may be responsible for the actions of an employee under certain circumstances, those circumstances have not been alleged in the instant case.”
• “When an employee’s injury arises out of the course and scope of his or her employment, worker’s compensation is the exclusive remedy for the injury, and the employer is provided with immunity from any other liability for the injury.”
• “Although workers’ compensation immunity usually cannot be raised in a motion to dismiss, an exception exists allowing the defense to be raised in a motion to dismiss where the defense appears on the face of the complaint.”
• “Although workers’ compensation immunity usually cannot be raised in a motion to dismiss, an exception exists allowing the defense to be raised in a motion to dismiss where the defense appears on the face of the complaint.”
• “Although workers’ compensation immunity usually cannot be raised in a motion to dismiss, an exception exists allowing the defense to be raised in a motion to dismiss where the defense appears on the face of the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).