Skip to main content
· 3/27/2008

Ruiz Rivera v. PEIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC

Citations

  • 521 F.3d 76
  • 20 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 718
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6354
  • 2008 WL 802730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that district courts have “substantial discretion and broad authority” in addressing motions for reconsideration
  • rejecting “regarded as” claim, for “[i]t simply will not do for a plaintiff to fail to plead with adequate specificity facts ■ to support a regarded as claim, all-the-while hoping to play that card if her initial hand is a dud.”
  • “a motion for reconsideration should be granted if the court ‘has patently misunderstood a party ... or has made an error not of reasoning but apprehension.’” (quoting Sandoval Diaz v. Sandoval Orozco, 2005 WL 1501672, at (D.P.R. 2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Howard, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.