Skip to main content
· 3/30/2000

Ruiz De Molina v. Merritt & Furman Insurance Agency

Citations

  • 207 F.3d 1351
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 117
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that minimum contacts are established when a defendant engages in intentional and tortuous conduct and knowingly causes injury to a party in the state
  • allowing personal jurisdiction over a fraudulent insurance claim under stream of commerce theory where out-of-forum defendants knew that the insurance was purchased by in-forum plaintiffs via an out-of-forum broker
  • allowing personal jurisdiction over a fraudulent insurance claim under stream of commerce theory where out-of-forum defendants knew that the insurance was purchased by in-forum plaintiffs via an out-of-forum broker
  • “[B]ecause these considerations serve to establish the reasonableness of jurisdiction in this case, a lesser showing of minimum contacts than otherwise would be required is sufficient.”
  • “Alabama permits its courts to exercise jurisdiction over nonresidents to the fullest extent allowed under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.”
  • applying “stream of commerce” test and Colder effects test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Wilson, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.