Ruiz-Casillas v. Camacho-Morales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellant’s equal protection claim, which was premised on allegations of political discrimination, “flounders, as it is a mere restatement of [her] failed First Amendment claim”
• holding that the plaintiff did not have a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment because he only had his duties downgraded but he was not fired
• holding that the plaintiff did not have a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment because he only had his duties downgraded but he was not fired
• “The failure of appellant’s constitutional claims obviates our need to address the qualified immunity defense: we have found no constitutional violation.”
• “The failure of appellant’s constitutional claims obviates our need to address the qualified immunity defense: we have found no constitutional violation.”
• “The failure of appellant’s constitutional claims obviates our need to address the qualified immunity defense: we have found no constitutional violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).